Analysis of Features and Methods for Data Delivery Routes Determination in the Wireless Self-Organizing Networks Based on the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Abstract

Currently, one of the promising areas in the development of network technologies is the wireless self-organizing networks based on the unmanned aerial vehicles, i.e., FANET (Flying Ad-Hoc Networks), which most important task in the course of their operation lies in organizing the effective data exchange. The distinctive properties of wireless self-organizing networks with altering topology are leading to the fact that technical solutions and methods of determination of the data delivery routes used in telecommunication networks with the traditional fixed architecture turn out to be inefficient in the special FANET networks and are not able to provide the required performance. At the same time, wireless self-organizing networks based on the unmanned aerial vehicles possess their own techniques used in data routing, which are subject to the requirements that take into account characteristic differences inherent in the networks of this type, including high mobility and low density of the nodes, dynamic and frequent topology alterations. Features and methods for determining data delivery routes were analyzed in the wireless self-organizing networks, which basis (nodes) were the unmanned aerial vehicles

Please cite this article in English as:

Kulagin G.I. Analysis of features and methods for data delivery routes determination in the wireless self-organizing networks based on the unmanned aerial vehicles. Herald of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Series Instrument Engineering, 2023, no. 1 (142), pp. 60--82 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18698/0236-3933-2023-1-60-82

References

[1] Wei S., Ge L., Yu W., et al. Simulation study of unmanned aerial vehicle communication networks addressing bandwidth disruptions. Proc. SPIE, 2014, vol. 9085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2050765

[2] Bekmezci I., Sahingoz O.K., Temel S. Flying Ad-Hoc networks (FANETs): a survey. Ad Hoc Netw., 2013, vol. 11, iss. 3, pp. 1254--1270. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.12.004

[3] Krichen L., Fourati M., Fourati L.C. Communication architecture for unmanned aerial vehicle system. In: Montavont N., Papadopoulos G. (eds). Ad-Hoc, Mobile, and Wireless Networks. ADHOC-NOW 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11104. Cham, Springer, pp. 213--225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00247-3_20

[4] Chertova O.G., Chirov D.S. Building a core communication network which is based on small size unmanned aircraft vehicle without ground infrastructure. Naukoemkie tekhnologii v kosmicheskikh issledovaniyakh Zemli [High Technologies in Earth Space Research], 2019, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 60--71 (in Russ.).

[5] Hentati A.I., Fourati L.C. Comprehensive survey of UAVs communication networks. Comput. Stand. Interfaces, 2020, vol. 72, art. 103451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2020.103451

[6] Bujari A., Calafate C.T., Cano J.C., et al. Flying Ad-Hoc network application scenarios and mobility models. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw., 2017, vol. 13, no. 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147717738192

[7] da Cruz E.P.F. A comprehensive survey in towards to future FANETs. IEEE Lat. Am. Trans., 2018, vol. 16, iss. 3, pp. 876--884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2018.8358668

[8] Bujari A., Palazzi C.E., Ronzani D. FANET application scenarios and mobility models. Proc. DroNet’17, 2017, pp. 43--46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3086439.3086440

[9] Kerrache C.A., Barka E., Lagraa N., et al. Reputation-aware energy-efficient solution for FANET monitoring. Proc. WMNC, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WMNC.2017.8248851

[10] Gupta L., Jain R., Vaszkun G. Survey of important issues in UAV communication networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., 2016, vol. 18, iss. 2, pp. 1123--1152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2015.2495297

[11] Shi W., Zhou H., Liet J., et al. Drone assisted vehicular networks: architecture, challenges and opportunities. IEEE Netw., 2018, vol. 32, iss. 3, pp. 130--137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2017.1700206

[12] Oubbati O.S., Lakas A., Zhou F., et al. A survey on position-based routing protocols for flying Ad-Hoc networks (FANETs). Veh. Commun., 2017, vol. 10, pp. 29--56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2017.10.003

[13] Nayyar A. Flying Adhoc network (FANETs): simulation based performance comparison of routing protocols: AODV, DSDV, DSR, OLSR, AOMDV and HWMP. Proc. icABCD, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICABCD.2018.8465130

[14] Khan M.A., Safi A., Qureshi M.I., et al. Flying Ad-Hoc networks (FANETs): a review of communication architectures, and routing protocols. Proc. INTELLECT, 2017.

[15] Chriki A., Touati H., Snoussi H., et al. FANET: communication, mobility models and security issues. Comput. Netw., 2019, vol. 163, art. 106877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2019.106877

[16] Lakew D.S., Sa’ad U., Dao N.N., et al. Routing in flying Ad-Hoc networks: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., 2020, vol. 22, iss. 2, pp. 1071--1120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2020.2982452

[17] Tareque Md.H., Hossain Md.S., Atiquzzaman M. On the routing in flying Ad-Hoc networks. Proc. FedCSIS, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15439/2015F002