A Method for Determining Frequency Response of Microphones in Unmuffled Laboratory Room Using Wideband Signal Excitement
Authors: Kuvykin Yu.А., Olkhovskiy A.N., Suprunyuk V.V., Sokolov I.N. | Published: 15.01.2022 |
Published in issue: #4(137)/2021 | |
DOI: 10.18698/0236-3933-2021-4-169-187 | |
Category: Instrument Engineering, Metrology, Information-Measuring Instruments and Systems | Chapter: Instruments and Measuring Methods | |
Keywords: microphone, method, frequency response, free field, FM signal, graduation, infinite impulse response filter, time delay spectrometry, sliding complex weighted averaging, software |
The paper introduces a method for determining the frequency response of microphones using a broadband excitation signal. The method is based on time deiay spectrometry and uses the recursive filter of the Goertzel algorithm and additional sliding complex weighted averaging under conditions burdened by sound reverberation. A combination of field and pressure measurements was used to minimize the effect of reflections during measurements. Relying on the algorithm, we developed software for post-processing the measurement results when determining the frequency response of microphones in an unmuffled laboratory room. Furthermore, we assembled a research measuring complex and experimentally tested the developed method and software determining the methodical error in the frequency response of microphones using a broadband excitation signal. The developed method and software are recommended for determining the frequency response of measuring microphones by the field in unmuffled reverberating laboratory rooms without auxiliary equipment, such as a damped chamber and a small-volume chamber, provided the practical recommendations given in the research are taken into consideration
References
[1] IEC 61094-6:2004. Measurement microphones. Part 6. Electrostatic actuators for determination of frequency response. Geneva, IEC Central office, 2004.
[2] Kuvykin Yu.A., Sokolov I.N., Olkhovskiy A.N. Study on method for determination of frequency response for condenser microphones using frequency-modulated signal. Vestnik metrologa, 2021, no. 2, pp. 25--31 (in Russ.).
[3] Salzano C., Walber C., Nowak M., et al. Acoustic methods of microphone calibration. ICV22, 2015, pp. 103--109.
[4] IEC 61094-8:2012. Measurement microphones. Part 8. Methods for determining the free-field sensitivity of working standard microphones by comparison. Geneva, IEC Central office, 2012.
[5] IEC 61094-5:2016. Electroacoustics --- measurement microphones. Part 5. Methods for pressure calibration of working standard microphones by comparison. Geneva, IEC Central office, 2016.
[6] Lavrov R.O., Kuvykin Yu.A. Comparative analysis of techniques of attenuation the acoustic reflections effect at free-field calibration of airborne sound receivers. T-Comm:Telekommunikatsii i transport, 2018, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 59--62 (in Russ.).
[7] Barham R., Barrera-Figueroa S., Avison J.E.M. Secondary pressure calibration of measurement microphones. Metrologia, 2014, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 129--138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/51/3/129
[8] Naumov S.S., Knyazeva N.I., Burenkov S.V. [Multifunctional acoustic measurements based on a modified time delay spectrometry method]. Akusticheskie izmereniya. Metody i sredstva. IV Sessiya Rossiyskogo akusticheskogo obshchestva [Acoustic measurements. Methods and means. IV Session of the Russian acoustic society]. Moscow, Akust. inst. im. N.N. Andreeva Publ., 1995, pp. 9--14.
[9] Heyser R. Acoustical measurements by time-delay spectrometry. JAES, 1989, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 370--382.
[10] Sysel P., Rajmic P. Goertzel algorithm generalized to non-integer multiples of fundamental frequency. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process., 2012, vol. 2012, art. 56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-6180-2012-56
[11] Dvorkovich V.P., Dvorkovich A.V. Okonnye funktsi dlya garmonicheskogo analiza signalov [Window functions for harmonic analysis of signals]. Moscow, Teknosfera Publ., 2016.
[12] Isaev A.E. Tochnaya graduirovka priemnikov zvukovogo davleniya v vodnoy srede v usloviyakh svobodnogo polya [Accurate calibration of sound pressure receivers in water in free-field conditions]. Mendeleevo, VNIIFTRI Publ., 2008.
[13] Isaev A.E., Matveev A.N. Two approaches to the continuous-radiation field calibration of a hydrophone in a nonanechoic water tank. Meas. Tech., 2008, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 1329--1336.
[14] Isaev A.E., Nikolaenko A.S., Chernikov I.V. Suppression of reverberation distortions of a receiver signal using the water tank transfer function. Acoust. Phys., 2017, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 175--184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063771017020075
[15] Isaev A.E., Matveev A.N. Use of a complex moving weighted averaging method for recerver nonuniform frequency response restoration. Acoust. Phys., 2010, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 693--696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063771010050155