Interface of Communication with Service Medical Robot Communication
Authors: Rogatkin D.A., Lapitan D.G. | Published: 14.02.2017 |
Published in issue: #1(112)/2017 | |
DOI: 10.18698/0236-3933-2017-1-35-48 | |
Category: Instrument Engineering, Metrology, Information-Measuring Instruments and Systems | Chapter: Instruments, Systems, and Production for Medical Use | |
Keywords: interface, human, robot, intelligent system, medicine |
The study tested the problem of developing the interface of communication between human and autonomous mobile service medical robots. The choice of multimodal interfaces was substantiated. Findings of the research show that the main input information for the robot, coming through the interface, can be divided into 3 categories: 1) command to perform actions; 2) enquiry; 3) unrecognized information. The incorporation of the interface into the intelligent robot control system at the present stage of robotics development is necessary only at the level of recognized commands, which should generate the motivation and the goal for the next robot’s actions. The output of the reference and help information as well as communication in terms of defining the input information can be performed in the interface on the "pre-intelligent" level of implementation.
References
[1] Nakano E. Vvedenie v robototekhniku [Introduction to robototronics]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1988. 334 p.
[2] Taylor R.H. A perspective on medical robotics. Proc. of the IEEE, 2006, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 1652-1664. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1717783 DOI: 10.1109/JPR0C.2006.880669
[3] Wang Y. et. al. The developing market for medical robotics. Proc. of the IEEE, 2006, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 1763-1771. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1717793 DOI: 10.1109/JPR0C.2006.880711
[4] Savrasov G.V. Development trends of medical robotics. Biomeditsinskaya radioelektronika [Biomedical Radioelectronics], 2007, no. 10, pp. 42-46 (in Russ.).
[5] Kraevskiy S.V., Rogatkin D.A. Medical robotics: the first steps of medical robots. Tekhnologii zhivykh system [Technologies of Living Systems], 2010, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 3-14 (in Russ.).
[6] Rogatkin D.A., Lapitan D.G., Lapaeva L.G. Conception of the mobile autonomous service medical robots. Biomeditsinskaya radioelektronika [Biomedical Radioelectronics], 2013, no. 5, pp. 46-56 (in Russ.).
[7] Mastrogiovanni F., Chong N.Y. The need for a research agenda in intelligent robotics. Intelligent Service Robotics, 2013, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-3. Available at: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11370-012-0127-x DOI: 10.1007/s11370-012-0127-x
[8] Antonelly G. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. Robotic research: Are we applying the scientific method? // Robohub: web-site. Available at: http://robohub.org/robotic-research-are-we-applying-the-scientific-method (accessed 18.10.2016).
[9] Yurevich E.I. Osnovy robototekhniki [Fundamentals of robotics]. Sankt-Petersburg, BKhV-Peterburg Publ., 2005. 416 p.
[10] Gaaze-Rapoport M.G., Pospelov D.A. Ot ameby do robota: modeli povedeniya [From amoeba to robot: Behavior model]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1987. 286 p.
[11] Yushchenko A.S. Human-robot: Compatibility and cooperation. Robototekhnika i tekhnicheskaya kibernetika [Robotics and Technical Cybernetics], 2014, no. 1 (2), pp. 4-9 (in Russ.).
[12] Towle Jr.B., Nicolescu M. An auction behavior-based robotic architecture for service robotics. Intelligent Service Robotics, 2014, vol. 7 (3), pp. 157-174. Available at: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11370-013-0141-7 DOI: 10.1007/s11370-013-0141-7
[13] Karpov V.E., Pavlovskiy V.E., Royzenzon G.V. Multicriterion approach to smart robot definition. Trudy 15-y Natsional’noy konferentsii po iskusstvennomu intellektu s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (KII-2016). T. 3 [Proc. 15th National conf. on artificial brain with international sharing (KII-2016). Vol. 3]. Smolensk, RAII Publ., 2016, pp. 312-319 (in Russ.).
[14] Rogatkin D., Lapaeva L., Lapitan D. Substantiation of the required world model configuration for autonomous mobile medical service robots. Proc. of the 9-th Int. Conf. on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC’2016). Vol. 1: BIODEVICES. Rome, INSTICC Publ., 2016, pp. 125-130.
[15] Stefanyuk V.L., Zhozhikashvili A.V. Sotrudnichayushchiy komp’yuter [Cooperative computer]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2007. 276 p.
[16] Karpov A.A., Ronzhin A.L. Multimodal interfaces in automated control systems. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Priborostroenie [Journal of Instrument Engineering], 2005, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 9-14 (in Russ.).
[17] Prishchepa M.V., Baranov K.Yu. Design features of user interface of mobile informational robot. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Priborostroenie. [Journal of Instrument Engineering], 2012, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 46-51 (in Russ.).
[18] Osipov G.S., Panov A.I., Chudova N.V. Behavior control as a function of consciousness. Part I. World model and goal setting. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, 2014, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 517-529. Available at: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1064230714040121 DOI: 10.1134/S1064230714040121
[19] Rogatkin D.A., Kulikov D.A., Ivlieva A.L. Three views on current data of neuroscience for the purposes of intelligent robotics. Modeling of Artificial Intelligence, 2015, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 98-136. Available at: http://oaji.net/articles/2015/681-1437419287.pdf DOI: 10.13187/mai.2015.6.98