Design-to-Order Unified Information Space Network-Centric Model and Architecture in the Complex Technical Products

Abstract

The paper considers general problems of information systems interoperability, approaches to its analysis and support. Basic requirements for ensuring the technical systems interoperability are provided. Approaches are analyzed to formation of the information interaction models in accordance with the level of conceptual interoperability model and the reference interoperability model. The concept of smart work-place is introduced in relation to the Design-to-order information support, objective and tasks of the smart workplace operation are formulated. Generalized network-centric architecture of the Design-to-order unified information space is presented, which provides information support in implementation of the design and production chain. The proposed unified information space architecture includes mechanisms of automatic generation and adaptation of the design data basic and domain-specific models taking into account the constantly altering application conditions. In general, the proposed network-centric architecture of the Design-to-order unified information space ensures uninterrupted information interaction from the customer to separate workplaces and target processes of the product life cycle. Using these adaptive ontological models appears more preferable than introduction of the static interoperability profile, which development could be hampered by complex nature of the integrated technical product being manufactured

The study was carried out with the financial support of the grant of the President of the Russian Federation for young scientists and post-graduates SP-133.2022.5

Please cite this article in English as:

Drozd O.V. Design-to-order unified information space network-centric model and architecture in the complex technical products. Herald of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Series Instrument Engineering, 2023, no. 2 (143), pp. 74--89 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18698/0236-3933-2023-2-74-89

References

[1] Bashlykova A.A., Kozlov S.V., Makarenko S.I., et al. An approach to ensuring interoperability in network-centric control systems. Zhurnal radioelektroniki [Journal of Radio Electronics], 2020, no. 6 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30898/1684-1719.2020.6.13

[2] Yusupov R.M., Sokolov B.V., Ptushkin A.I., et al. Research problems analysis of artificial objects lifecycle management. Trudy SPIIRAN [SPIIRAS Proceedings], 2011, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 37--109 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15622/sp.16.2

[3] Yahia E., Aubry A., Panetto H. Formal measures for semantic interoperability assessment in cooperative enterprise information systems. Comput. Ind., 2012, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 443--457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2012.01.010

[4] Rezaei R., Chiew T.K., Lee S.P., et al. Interoperability evaluation models: a systematic review. Comput. Ind., 2014, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 1--23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2013.09.001

[5] Panetto H. Towards a classification framework for interoperability of enterprise applications. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 2007, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 727--740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09511920600996419

[6] Burns T., Cosgrove J., Doyle F. A review of interoperability standards for Industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf., 2019, vol. 38, pp. 646--653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.083

[7] Makarenko S.I., Oleynikov A.Ya., Chernitskaya T.E. Models of interoperability assessment for information systems. Sistemy upravleniya, svyazi i bezopasnosti [Systems of Control, Communication and Security], 2019, no. 4, pp. 215--245 (in Russ.).DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2410-9916-2019-10408

[8] Sjarov M., Kisskalt D., Lechler T., et al. Towards "Design for Interoperability" in the context of Systems Engineering. Procedia CIRP, 2020, vol. 96, pp. 145--150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.067

[9] El Kadiri S., Kiritsis D. Ontologies in the context of product lifecycle management: state of the art literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res., 2015, vol. 53, no. 18, pp. 5657--5668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1052155

[10] Fraga A.L., Vegetti M., Leone H.P. Ontology-based solutions for interoperability among product lifecycle management systems: a systematic literature review. J. Ind. Inf. Integration, 2020, vol. 20, art. 100176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2020.100176

[11] He Y., Hao C., Wang Y., et al. An ontology-based method of knowledge modelling for remanufacturing process planning. J. Clean. Prod., 2020, vol. 258, art. 120952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120952

[12] McKendry D.A., Whitfield R.I., Duffy A.H.B. Product Lifecycle Management implementation for high value Engineering to Order programmes: an informational perspective. J. Ind. Inf. Integration, 2022, vol. 26, art. 100264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100264

[13] Willner O., Gosling J., Schonsleben P. Establishing a maturity model for design automation in sales-delivery processes of ETO products. Comput. Ind., 2016, vol. 82, pp. 57--68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.05.003

[14] Dhiman H., Rocker C. Worker assistance in smart production environments using pervasive technologies. IEEE PerCom Workshop, 2019, pp. 95--100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2019.8730771

[15] Alobaidi M., Malik K.M., Hussain M. Automated ontology generation framework powered by linked biomedical ontologies for disease-drug domain. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 2018, vol. 165, pp. 117--128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.08.010

[16] Malik K.M., Krishnamurthy M., Alobaidi M., et al. Automated domain-specific healthcare knowledge graph curation framework: subarachnoid hemorrhage as phenotype. Expert Syst. Appl., 2020, vol. 145, art. 113120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113120

[17] Mendonca M., Perozo N., Aguilar J. Ontological emergence scheme in self-organized and emerging systems. Adv. Eng. Inform., 2020, vol. 44, art. 101045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101045