|

Recovering Seismic Sensor Data on Arrival Time Differences for Longitudinal and Transverse Seismic Waves

Authors: Aslanov T.G. Published: 25.09.2022
Published in issue: #3(140)/2022  
DOI: 10.18698/0236-3933-2022-3-4-17

 
Category: Informatics, Computer Engineering and Control | Chapter: System Analysis, Control, and Information Processing  
Keywords: neural network, time difference, seismic sensors, seismology, seismic wave velocities

Abstract

We developed a method for seismic sensor data recovery and simulated seismic sensor operation using artificial neural networks. We selected two parameters to train the artificial neural network on: the time between seismograph recordings of longitudinal (primary) and transverse (secondary) seismic waves, as well as the time between primary seismic wave recordings by two seismographs located at a certain distance from each other. We used data on 2636 earthquakes that occurred in 2020 in the Republic of Dagestan for our seismograph data recovery. The existing 19 seismic stations recorded less than 60 % of the total number of earthquakes. To recover seismic data, we trained the neural network twice for each seismic sensor, the first time involving zero time differences regarding seismic wave arrival at seismographs that did not record the time, and the second time involving time differences recovered from the results of training the neural network for the first time. Times between seismic wave recordings with known data were used as inputs to train the artificial neural network, while time differences to be determined were designated as outputs. The trained neural network displays a correlation coefficient related to real time intervals between seismograph recordings of seismic waves that exceeds 0.99919. The paper provides root-mean-square error plots of the neural network operation by epochs of its training, plots demonstrating how training results calculated by the neural network matchthe initial data, and histograms of neural network operation errors

The study was supported by a grant awarded by the Head of the Republic of Dagestan

Please cite this article in English as:

Aslanov T.G. Recovering seismic sensor data on arrival time differences for longitudinal and transverse seismic waves. Herald of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Series Instrument Engineering, 2022, no. 3 (140), pp. 4--17 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18698/0236-3933-2022-3-4-17

References

[1] Shakhramanyan M.A., Nigmetov G.M., Proshlyakov M.Yu. Technology for assessing stability and seismic resistance of buildings and structures. Tekhnologii grazhdanskoy bezopasnosti, 2004, no. 2, pp. 27--37 (in Russ.).

[2] Shakhramanyan M.A. Otsenka seysmicheskogo riska i prognoz posledstviy zemletryaseniy v zadachakh spaseniya naseleniya [Seismic risk assessment and prediction of earthquake consequences in problems of population rescue]. Moscow, VNII GOChS Publ., 2000.

[3] Morozov V.N., Shakhramanyan M.A. Prognozirovanie i likvidatsiya posledstviy avariynykh vzryvov i zemletryaseniy [Forecasting and elimination of emergency explosions and earthquakes consequences]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 1998.

[4] Aslanov T.G., Musaeva U.A. Analysis of error distribution density in determining the coordinates of earthing earth in the methods of spheres and ellipsoids. Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki [Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Science], 2019, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 61--70 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2019-46-2-61-70

[5] Shakhtarin B.I., Aslanov G.K., Aslanov T.G., et al. Determination of the earthquakes centre coordinates using second order figures: ellipse and hyperbola. Avtomatizatsiya. Sovremennye tekhnologii, 2018, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 503--509 (in Russ.).

[6] Aslanov T.G. Definition of earthquake focus coordinates using a combined method. Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki [Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Science], 2017, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 118--125 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2017-44-2-118-125

[7] Aslanov T.G., Magomedov Kh.D., Musaeva U.A., et al. Influence of the spatial arrangement of seismic detectors on the accuracy of earthquake hypocentre determination. Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki [Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Science], 2016, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 73--84 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2016-43-4-73-84

[8] Shakhtarin B.I., Aslanov T.G., Tetakaev U.R. Determination of earthquake focus coordinates using the Cassini oval method with second- and fourth-order hyperbola figures. Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki [Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Science], 2019, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 134--142 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2019-46-4-134-142

[9] Aslanov G.K., Aslanov T.G. Average error determination in the calculation of earthquake epicenter coordinates. Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki [Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Science], 2021, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 20--28 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2021-48-2-20-28

[10] Aslanov G.K., Aslanov T.G., Kurbanmagomedov K.D., et al. Investigation of the dependence of earthquake focus coordinate determination errors on calculation methods (spheres and hyperboloids). Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki [Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Science], 2017, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 87--98 (in Russ.).DOI: https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2017-44-4-87-98

[11] Aslanov G.K., Aslanov T.G. Determination of coordinates of the earthquake hypocenter by the method of circles. Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki [Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Science], 2021, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 52--58 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2021-48-3-52-58

[12] Rogozhin E.A. Earthquake in Iran. Geografiya, 2004, no. 5 (in Russ.).Available at: http://geo.1september.ru/article.php?ID=200400503

[13] Aslanov G.K., Aslanov T.G., Musaeva U.A. Anomalous errors in determining focus coordinates earthquakes and suggestions for their elimination. Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki [Herald of Dagestan State Technical University. Technical Science], 2018, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 78--88 (in Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21822/2073-6185-2018-45-4-78-88

[14] Kedrov O.K. Seysmicheskie metody kontrolya yadernykh ispytaniy [Seismic methods of nuclear tests monitoring]. Moscow, IPE RAS Publ., 2005.

[15] Set statsionarnykh seysmicheskikh stantsiy [Network of stationary seismic stations]. dbgsras.ru: website (in Russ.). Available at: http://dbgsras.ru/article/view/set-stacionarnyh-sejsmiceskih-stancij (accessed: 15.06.2022).