Analysis of the Eeffective Ffluorescent Radiation Detection Range in Identifying the Light Petroleum Products Spill

Abstract

The paper presents a mathematical simulation based on the experimentally measured fluorescence spectra of the light petroleum products, water bodies and vegetation to analyze the effective spectral ranges of the fluorescent radiation registration in detecting the light petroleum products spill in regard to the 355 nm fluorescence excitation wavelength. Simulation results revealed that probabilities of correct detection and false alarms in the task of detecting the light oil product spills were depending on the oil product type. Highest probabilities of correct detection (more than 0.999) and insignificant probabilities of false alarms (less than 0.012) could be achieved for the light petroleum products with the maximum fluorescent emission intensity at wavelengths of ~ 390, 415 nm (using the two spectral channels, respectively, 390, 550 nm and 415, 475 nm). For the light petroleum products with the maximum fluorescent radiation intensity at the wavelengths of ~ 430 nm, the most effective was to use the three spectral channels with central wavelengths of ~ 430, 475, 675 nm. With such petroleum products, the results were somewhat worse; however, the fluorescent monitoring still provided high probabilities in correct detection and low probabilities of the false alarms. With light petroleum products having the fluorescent radiation maximum intensity at wavelengths of ~ 470 nm, the most effective approach was in using the two spectral channels with the central wavelengths of ~ 535, 695 nm. In such spectrum of the petroleum products (characterizing a long period of time after the spill), results were becoming worse, i.e., higher probabilities of correct detection and false alarms were appearing

Please cite this article in English as:

Belov М.L., Fedotov Yu.V., Nguyen Minh Bach, et al. Analysis of the effective fluorescent radiation detection range in identifying the light petroleum products spill. Herald of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Series Instrument Engineering, 2024, no. 2 (147), pp. 4--21 (in Russ.). EDN: HFSEFK

References

[1] Chernogaeva G.M., ed. Obzor sostoyaniya i zagryazneniya okruzhayushchey sredy v rossiyskoy federatsii za 2022 god [Review of the state and pollution of the environment in the Russian Federation for 2022]. Moscow, Rosgidromet Publ., 2023.

[2] Huettel M. Oil pollution of beaches. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng., 2022, vol. 36, art. 100803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2022.100803

[3] Roche B.H.R., King M.D. Quantifying the effects of background concentrations of crude oil pollution on sea ice albedo. The Cryosphere, 2022, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 3949--3970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3949-2022

[4] Komene G.L., Remi C.O. Oil pollution crisis and relationship marketing approach of oil firms in Niger delta. BJMMS, 2022, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 39--78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52589/BJMMS-2HWKHPGW

[5] Ismailova N.M., Nadjafova S.I. Experience in assessing environmental risks of main oil pipelines in Azerbaijan through the prism of soil biogeoresistance to crude oil pollution. Moscow Univ. Soil Sc. Bull., 2022, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 196--202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S014768742203005X

[6] Zhang J., Hoffman A., Kane A., et al. Development of pipeline leak detection technologies. 10th Int. Pipeline Conf., 2014, paper no. IPC2014-33619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2014-33619

[7] Fedotov Yu.V., Belov M.L., Kravtsov D.A., et al. Laser fluorescence method for detecting oil pipeline leaks at a wavelength of 355 nm. J. Opt. Technol., 2019, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 81--85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/JOT.86.000081

[8] Fedotov Yu.V., Belov M.L., Kravtsov D.A., et al. Selecting laser fluorosensor detection band to monitor oil pipeline leaks. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sc. Eng., 2021, vol. 1155, art. 012074. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1155/1/012074

[9] Fedotov Yu.V., Belov M.L., Kravtsov D.A., et al. Experimental investigation of the dynamics in laser-induced fluorescence spectra of oil pollution. Herald of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Series Natural Sciences, 2019, no. 1 (82), pp. 66--76 (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18698/1812-3368-2019-1-66-76

[10] Belov M.L., Belov A.M., Gorodnichev V.A. Laser monopulse fluorescent method of oil pollution monitoring. Herald of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Series Instrument Engineering, 2018, no. 6 (123), pp. 62--74 (in Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18698/0236-3933-2018-6-62-74

[11] Fan Z., Schroder O., Krahl J. Analysis of diesel fuels/biodiesel blends and identification of biodiesel using Time--Resolved--Laser-induced Fluorescence Spectroscopy (TRLFS). Appl. Agric. Forestry Res., 2015, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 1--14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3220/LBF1433315502000

[12] Pashayev A., Tagiyev B., Allahverdiyev K., et al. LIDAR for remote sensing of contaminations on water and earth surfaces taking place during oil-gas production. Proc. SPIE, 2015, vol. 9810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2225219

[13] Palombi L., Lognoli D., Raimondi V. Fluorescence LIDAR remote sensing of oils: merging spectral and time-decay measurements. Proc. SPIE, 2013, vol. 8887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2030204

[14] Utkin A.B., Lavrova A., Vilar R. Evaluation of oil spills by laser induced fluorescence spectra. Proc. SPIE, 2011, vol. 7994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.880750

[15] Saitoh N., Takeuchi S. Fluorescence imaging of petroleum accelerants by time-resolved spectroscopy with a pulsed Nd:YAG laser. Forensic Sc. Int., 2006, vol. 163, no. 1-2, pp. 38--50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.10.025

[16] Karpicz R., Dementjev A., Kuprionis Z., et al. Laser fluorosensor for oil spot detection. Lith. J. Phys., 2005, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 213--218. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3952/lithjphys.45309

[17] Hegazi E., Hamdan A., Mastromarino J. Remote fingerprinting of crude oil using time-resolved fluorescence spectra. Arab. J. Sc. Eng., 2005, vol. 30, no. 1B, pp. 3--12.

[18] Malecha M., Bessant C., Saini S. Identification of oil contaminants on polymer coated beverage cans using fluorescence spectroscopy. Appl. Spectrosc., 2003, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1042--1048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1366/000370203322259020

[19] Pastor J.V., Lopez J.J., Julia J.E., et al. Planar laser-induced fluorescence fuel concentration measurements in isothermal diesel sprays. Opt. Express, 2002, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 309--323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.10.000309

[20] Patsayeva S., Yuzhakov V., Varlamov V., et al. Laser spectroscopy of mineral oils on the water surface. EARSeL eProceedings, 2000, no. 1, pp. 106--114.

[21] Belov M.L., Nguen Min Bach. Selection of ranges for registration of laser-induced fluorescent radiation for the task of detecting diesel fuel spills. Kontenant [Contenant], 2022, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 53--67 (in Russ.).

[22] Fedotov Yu.V., Belov M.L., Kravtsov D.A., et al. Experimental studies of efficient sensing fluorescence radiation bands to detect oil and petroleum product spills. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2019, vol. 1399, art. 055037. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1399/5/055037

[23] Yang J., Gong W., Shi S., et al. Excitation wavelength analysis of laser-induced fluorescence LiDAR for identifying plant species. IEEE Geosc. Remote Sens. Lett., 2016, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 977--981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2016.2557484

[24] Meyer S., Cartelat A., Moya I., et al. UV-induced blue-green and far-red fluorescence along wheat leaves: a potential signature of leaf ageing. J. Exp. Bot., 2003, vol. 54, no. 383, pp. 757--769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg063

[25] Snels M., Guarini R., Dell Ag1io M. First results obtained with a LIDAR fluorescence sensor system. Proc. SPIE, 2000, vol. 4070, pp. 100--107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.378144

[26] Yang J., Gong W., Shi S., et al. Analyzing the performance of fluorescence parameters in the monitoring of leaf nitrogen content of paddy rice. Sc. Rep., 2016, vol. 6, art. 28787. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28787

[27] Maurya R., Gopal R. Laser-induced fluorescence ratios of Cajanus cajan L. under the stress of cadmium and its correlation with pigment content and pigment ratios. Appl. Spectrosc., 2008, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 433--438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1366/000370208784046687

[28] Lichtenthaler H.K., Lang M., Sowinska M., et al. Detection of vegetation stress via a new high resolution fluorescence imaging system. J. Plant Physiol., 1996, vol. 148, no. 5, pp. 599--612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(96)80081-2

[29] Maurya R., Gopal R. Study of laser-induced fluorescence signatures from leaves of wheat seedlings growing under cadmium stress. Gen. Appl. Plant Physiology, 2005, vol. 31, no. 3-4, pp. 181--196.

[30] Mishra K.B., Gopal R. Detection of nickel-induced stress using laser-induced fluorescence signatures from leaves of wheat seedlings. Int. J. Remote Sens., 2008, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 157--173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160701280975

[31] Luedeker W., Guenther K.P., Dahn H.G. Detection and mapping of oil contaminated soils by remote sensing of laser induced fluorescence. Proc. SPIE, 1995, vol. 2504, pp. 426--435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.224129

[32] Ciuciu G.J., Secrieru D., Pavelescu G., et al. Investigation of seawater pollution on the Black Sea Romanian coast. Proc. SPIE, 2006, vol. 6522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.723173